Check out this interesting article on Ivan Raszi of stocklogos.com and his interpretation of the future of some very famous logos. I wonder how accurate these will turn out to be. There’s something to be said for the crazy simplicity of his predicted ideas and the actual oversimplified evolution of logos over the years. And this GAP one is just funny given their strangely controversial logo switch back in 2010.
Image from Ivan Raszi’s website.
I realize this is largely a statement, but I definitely find some truth to the humor. Are we too busy and/or lazy to spend too much time interpreting visuals, or is simple really better?